Synchronous Javascript with fibers
Mar 2, 2015
I was suprised how nice to get rid of endless nested callbacks in javascript.
I was playing with node-fibers, trying to make it easier to write tests.. One day I came up with idea: what if one function can run asynchronously when we call inside fiber and synchronous when passing a callback function. Here's how I can make it:
var Fiber = require('fibers');
// can be called to convert multiple methods
Fiber.makeSync = function (receiver) {
for (var n = 1; n < arguments.length; n++) {
Fiber.makeSyncFn(receiver, arguments[n]);
}
};
Fiber.makeSyncFn = function(receiver, methodName, errorArgNum) {
var origFn = receiver[methodName];
if (origFn == undefined) {
throw "Object don't have property '" + methodName + "'";
}
receiver[methodName] = function () {
var lastArg = arguments[arguments.length - 1];
// check if it called inside Fiber
if (Fiber.current && typeof lastArg != 'function') {
var fiber = Fiber.current;
var newValue;
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
if (typeof errorArgNum == 'undefined') errorArgNum = 1;
args.push(function(data) {
// retrieve error from arguments (optional)
var error = arguments[errorArgNum];
if (error) {
throw error;
}
// assign result and resume fiber
newValue = errorArgNum == 0 ? arguments[1] : data;
fiber.run();
});
// call original function with fiber-aware callback
origFn.apply(this, args);
// pause and wait till resume
Fiber.yield();
return newValue;
} else {
origFn.apply(this, arguments);
}
};
};
module.exports = Fiber;
Fibers provide just one simple thing: stop execution and waiting for resume. For every function with callback we can call it, put fiber on pause then when we get callback - unpause and continue execution. Code become not blocking but asynchronous.
Here's how you can use it:
Fiber.makeSyncFn(redisClient, 'get', 0); // 0 is number if error argument passed in callback
Fiber.makeSyncFn(redisClient, 'set', 0);
Fiber(function () {
var value = redisClient.get('some_key');
redisClient.get('some_key', value + 1);
}).run();
When we call Fiber.makeSyncFn
it will override original function. If Fiber.current
present and if last argument is not a function then it will run it in fiber-aware wrapper, otherwise it will run in usual way.
You can also patch prototype in same way:
Fiber.makeSyncFn(redis.RedisClient.prototype, 'set', 0);
Fiber.makeSyncFn(redis.RedisClient.prototype, 'get', 0);
I made some benchmarks: simple http server, it reads key from redis, increase by 1 and write to redis, I'm creating new fiber for every request. Then I compare it with same http server written in asynchronous way.
running 5000 times and see:
name | time per request |
---|---|
w/fibers | 0.751ms |
async | 0.706ms |
I ran it many times, difference is about 0.1ms - 0.02ms
Other benchmark is a counter, made to eliminate open-close fiber timing: compare with classic-callback code, overhead is about 0.01ms - 0.007ms, that time spent to pause and unpause a fiber.
For me I feel pretty glad to make code more readable and maintainable, even I need to trade some microseconds (or milliseconds).
* As a bonus it gives us a way to track exceptions with try-catch
When you should NOT use fibers:
- When you want to run some asynchronous things in parallel, for example query db and make http request
- When you want your code run in browser as well
- When your callback function receive more then one argument and you need them
Continue reading: an article about Generators vs Fibers
comments powered by Disqus